In short, conscience may not always be right. And one is not obliged to follow a sick or erroneous conscience. So the advice to follow one's conscience is deficient. It needs to be a well-formed and healthy conscience.
Examples of sick consciences are scrupulosity and laxity. The first feels guilt where there is no sin, the latter feels no guilt despite the sin. And if one has a sick conscience, then one needs to see a spiritual director for "treatment".
If one's conscience is healthy, then there is still a need to inform or educate it. The bishops issued guidelines in a document entitled "Forming Consciences for Faithful Citizenship: A Call to Political Responsibility from the Catholic Bishops of the United States" where it was stated:
34. Catholics often face difficult choices about how to vote. This is why it is so important to vote according to a well-formed conscience that perceives the proper relationship among moral goods. A Catholic cannot vote for a candidate who takes a position in favor of an intrinsic evil, such as abortion or racism, if the voter’s intent is to support that position. In such cases a Catholic would be guilty of formal cooperation in grave evil. At the same time, a voter should not use a candidate’s
opposition to an intrinsic evil to justify indifference or inattentiveness to other important moral issues involving human life and dignity.
42. As Catholics we are not single-issue voters. A candidate’s position on a single issue is not sufficient to guarantee a voter’s support. Yet a candidate’s position on a single issue that involves an intrinsic evil, such as support for legal abortion or the promotion of racism, may legitimately lead a voter to disqualify a candidate from receiving support.
These and others would have made it clear to any conscientious Catholic that a vote for Obama was immoral. However, others did not see it that way because they were mislead by fake Catholic groups who misrepresented the Catholic standards and by the politicians themselves who misrepresented their positions. Because of this, one has the duty to get down to the truth by looking at the candidate's voting records and past activities to confirm the veracity of his claims.
References:
1. http://www.ewtn.com/library/scriptur/conscien.txt
2. http://www.faithfulcitizenship.org/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
Will The 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Be STOLEN by using the 2004 Hugo Chávez Recall Model that was used in Venezuela? Venezuela: Aca...
-
http://www.catholicsistas.com/2012/12/19/salvation-army-bells-for-abortion/ excerpt SALVATION ARMY MISSION STATEMENT On its surface the...
-
I walked down the street in Barcelona, and suddenly discovered a terrible truth – Europe died in Auschwitz. We killed six million Jews and...
-
http://www.facebook.com/the40film http://www.twitter.com/the40film 40 is a film that will take on the heated issue of abortion in our nat...
-
CNN host Chris Cuomo grilled Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) on New Day Wednesday morning, challenging him to move beyond criticism of the Affordab...
-
An invitation from Patrick Archibold Excerpt: In a way that seemed almost impossible, the entire battle has turned. I need not go into detai...
-
I have a son who stopped breathing through his nose and a wife who is squirming in pain. What if I didn’t have insurance? All these rushed t...
-
With my brother who served in the US Army and later in the Army Reserves. My children holding the ribbons of their great grandfather who he...
-
If video fails, go to http://divine-ripples.blogspot.com/2010/08/video-muslim-is-not-profile-it-is.html
Blog Archive
- ► 2013 (529)
- ► 2012 (797)
- ► 2011 (540)
- ▼ 2010 (672)