Explicit cartoons, films and books have been cleared for use to teach sex education to schoolchildren as young as five. A disturbing dossier exposes a wide range of graphic resources recommended for primary school lessons. The shocking material – promoted by local councils and even the BBC – teaches youngsters about adult language and sexual intercourse.
From the pedagogical perspective, one will find the following items to be problematic:
1.) The definition of prostitute is so non-judgmental like it's just another job. One can define nanny along the same breath with absolutely no qualitative distinction. Might as well as add that to the career handbook.
2.) The description of straight or gay is again so benign, so innocent sugggesting normalcy - no different from the hetesexuality.
3.) The description of an orgasm sounds like fun to explore. And it spells how just how to get one: by yourself or with your playmate. If you were a kid, wouldn't you want to experience this pleasure?
4.) The ways of copulation with balloons and space hopper suggests that it is an activity as innocent as child's play. So, kids will then ask what do you want to play: tag, dress up or getting it together.
5.) The definiton of masturbation and intercourse is so clinical with no moral qualification. Just another activity like eating or napping.
If parents find this offensive or corrupting, they can always opt out their child. However, the majority would probably stay and one can foresee the sexually charged climate that will result from this. Worse, there will be two moralities facing the child: one from State where everything goes and one from parents. It now becomes a battle for the heart and mind of the child to gain his soul. But why is the government even going here? Here is a motive.
With Obamacare funded already at $105 Billion dollars, kids can go to Planned Parenthood and get an abortion that is already paid for by our taxes (expect them to rise - a lot). The school will even drive them there and it will be done in all confidentiality (thanks to those privacy laws that led to the legalization of abortion). And when purity goes, the entire character goes. When the child has no character, then what else is there left that has value? (While the program cited is in the UK, the Obama administration has done similar things. Just go to the blog posts under "Education".)
And these evils as are old as the hills. God condems these through Isaiah saying, "Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter." (Isaiah 5:20) And the Lord Jesus points out that the culpability is worse when it involves children as He warns, "And if anyone causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to be thrown into the sea with a large millstone tied around his neck." (Mk 9:42)