Video: Jihad Rages Vs USA; Obama must pick a side

Source: http://www.tangle.com/view_video?viewkey=25b77dd863c66a7144bc or click here

President Obama Must Choose Sides

"In his speech last spring in Cairo, Mr. Obama said, "I consider it part of my responsibility as President of the United States to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam wherever they appear." Defending the honor of Islam and protecting Muslims is one of the goals that Barack Obama has set for himself. It constitutes a personal definition of his presidency. But is he doing so to the point of misleading the public in general, and at the risk of jeopardizing the American people in particular?

The near-deaths of three hundred people on Christmas due to an Islamic terrorist plot -- an act of war against America -- did not rouse Obama from golf and relaxation until three days later. When he finally spoke, he disrespected us, as before, by claiming that this was a "lone event" disconnected from anything larger. But most Americans knew what it was, and the subsequent reports and al-Qaeda announcement told us that this was an act of jihad, a part of the larger scheme of radical Islam in its war against America.

After the Fort Hood massacre, the president's first reaction was to intone the silly assertion that we "do not know what prompted this outrage." In fact, everyone immediately intuited what was verified more each day after the carnage: that devotion to the Islamic cause generated Nidal Hasan's decision to kill American infidels. The president was strangely unwilling to tie these murders to Islam or jihad or imams, even knowing that the jihadist yelled "Allah aqbar" as he mowed down innocent Americans.  "  In all these matters, Mr. Obama's first concern seems to protect things Islamic rather than name and fight the Islamism intent on destroying us.

Source http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/01/president_obama_must_choose_wh.html or click the title.

Opinion: 

There are moderate and conservative Muslims who do not think that others are fair game.  Their jihad is waged within themselves, against sinful inclinations.  They fast, pray and give alms.  However, there is the militant branch of Islam that calls for the destruction of all infidels or non-Muslims - starting with the great Satan, America.  If the administration will shy away from addressing that common feature of all the terrorist attacks for the sake of being cordial, then it is not being realistic for starters and secondly it is deceiving and dumbing its own intelligence analysis.  Why the administration took this route can only posit dubious motives but the security of the American people would not be one of them.

Vid: Is a New American Revolution Immanent?

"WASHINGTON - From bailouts to boatloads of spending, there's no denying that Americans are mad.
Emotions are high at Tea Party protests across the country and now it's showing in the polls.They range from very angry, at 46 percent, to 25 percent being somewhat angry at current government policies. ...White House officials have no plans to dial back on their agenda in 2010. They believe the bailouts, health care reform, and stimulus money for jobs are crucial to improving the economy.  But it's a risky strategy: if the economy doesn't turn around, the big government cry of socialism against President Obama could get even louder."



source http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/politics/2010/January/Anger-at-Big-Govt-Fueling-New-Revolution/ or click here

Circumventing the people's will can have dire consequences - even now.

"As Republican Scott Brown’s campaign warms up to take Ted Kennedy’s Senate seat in Massachusetts, Frank Quaratiello of the Boston Herald is reporting something shocking: if Brown wins, Massachusetts Democrats may drag out his certification as the victor to enable appointed Sen. Paul Kirk (the former DNC chairman) to put ObamaCare over the top.

"We want to get this resolved before President Obama’s State of the Union address in early to mid-February," Kirk told reporters at a Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce breakfast...
"Absolutely," Kirk said, when asked if he’d vote for the bill, even if Brown captures the seat. "It would be my responsibility as United States senator, representing the people and understanding Senator Kennedy’s agenda. . . . I think you’re asking me a hypothetical question but I’d be pleased to vote for the bill."
After all the rule-bending shenanigans of the Massachusetts Democrats, leaving a dying Kennedy in office, and then ramrodding Kirk's appointment to the Senate to help ObamaCare, now they're desperate enough to ignore the people's vote?"  from http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2010/01/09/stunner-scared-mass-dems-plot-delay-gop-victory-teddy-seat-until-obamaca#ixzz0cDxmL6jk or continue here

Opinion:

Circumventing the people's will can have dire consequences.  It is definitely going to rout the Democrats out of office in 2010 & 2012 unless the electoral process also gets mired into the culture of corruption and they somehow pull it off using inmates and dead people’s votes. Regardless, the consequences can even come sooner as the ruling party continues impose their ideology instead of respecting the people's will as they shut down the forum for debate, circumvented the legislative process and now change the rules.  With the weakening of the intelligence organizations at home and abroad as shown by the numerous lapses in security, there is a high probability that there will be more attempts until this administration's term is over.  If has gotten so bad that people are wondering if Obama is al-Qaida 

 http://normanhooben.blogspot.com/2010/01/is-obama-al-qaeda-just-wondering-out.html  or click here