May 31, 2012
States Should Flatly Reject ObamaCare Exchanges
Tweet this: http://bit.ly/KuJ9i5
http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/no-obamacare-exchanges
Here are just a few reasons why states should refuse to create ObamaCare Exchanges.
Jobs. Refusing to create an exchange will block Obamacare from imposing a tax on employers whose health benefits do not meet the federal government's definition of "essential" coverage. That tax can run as high as $3,000 per employee. A state that refuses to create an exchange will spare its employers from that tax, and will therefore enable them to create more jobs.
Religious freedom. In blocking that employer tax, state officials would likewise block Obamacare's effort to force religious employers to provide coverage for services they find immoral — like contraception, pharmaceutical abortions, and sterilization.
The federal debt. Refusing to create exchanges would also reduce the federal debt, because it would prevent the Obama administration from doling out billions of dollars in subsidies to private insurance companies.
The U.S. Constitution. The Obama administration has indicated that it might try to tax employers and hand out those subsidies anyway — even in states that don't create an exchange, and even though neither Obamacare nor any other federal law gives it the power to do so. If that happens, the fact that a state has refused to create an exchange would give every large employer in the state — including the state government itself — the ability to go to court to block the administration's attempt to usurp Congress's legislative powers.
A lower state tax burden. States that opt to create an exchange can expect to pay anywhere from $10 million to $100 million per year to run it. But if states refuse, Obamacare says the federal government must pay to create one. Why should states pay for something that the federal government is giving away?
Bye-bye, Obamacare. That is, if the feds can create an exchange at all. The Obama administration has admitted it doesn't have the money — and good luck getting any such funding through the GOP-controlled House. Moreover, without state-run exchanges, the feds can't subsidize private insurance companies. That by itself could cause Obamacare to collapse.
Michael F. Cannon is the director of Health Policy Studies at the Cato Institute. Video Produced by Caleb O. Brown and Austin Bragg.
Popular Posts
-
Christine O'Donnell is that outsider whom the GOP establishment does not support enthusiastically. This vintage 90s video shows her opp...
-
JERUSALEM – In what Egypt's Christians fear may be a sign of things to come, a senior Islamic cleric asked Christians to bow in Muslim p...
-
St. John Bosco's method of going to Confessions frequently has produced 29 official saints. So, I decided to make it a family routine t...
-
When the mother does not produce milk, you have other options besides buying formula. Formula is no match for mother’s milk because it does ...
-
Get a red envelope. You can buy them at Kinkos, stationery or party supply stores. On the front, address it to: President Barack Obama The W...
-
In the past, the US sent observers abroad to monitor the elections. (My uncle was even mistaken to be CIA because he visited during those d...
-
My 7 year old boy, "Steven" has a caterpillar project that has become a family undertaking. We watched YouTube clips and went with...
-
No wonder people are conflicted. It's that approach-avoid conflict. This video explains it all. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9j3_Ki...
-
The media is falling all over itself to claim the economy has recovered. Millions dropped off the rolls? No problem. All part time jobs? ...
-
Muslims think they're better than Christians because they believe they have the greatest and last prophet, Mohammed teach them about God...
Blog Archive
- ► 2013 (528)
- ▼ 2012 (797)
- ► 2011 (540)
- ► 2010 (672)
No comments:
Post a Comment