Good 'Hate' Speeches

Today, the Liberal media shamelessly blame Conservatives' speech for the fault of a deranged man.  So, there's even no causal relationship but no one expects the Left to either be sincere or sensible.  Regardless, this leads us to examine the issue of censorship as one man's "hate" speech is another man's revelation and inspiration.  And if these historical speeches in the video had not been made, then the world would have been far worse off than it is now. 

Only the opponents of truth and righteousness fear their exposure.  Only they try to muzzle the prophets and outlaw their proclamations.  See how Islam outlaws all criticism and punishes with death those who speak against it.  Although I think, no law could have stopped the leaders from making them anyway.  If video fails, go to http://divine-ripples.blogspot.com/2011/01/without-these-hate-speeches-world-would.html 

H/T AmusingBunni

Single Greatest Threat to National Security

Democrats want to stop the bloggers from exposing Obama's unconstitutional agenda.

From Out of Order

Obama's Provocative Rhetoric Caused Violent Reactions

Obama: “They Bring a Knife…We Bring a Gun”
Obama to His Followers: “Get in Their Faces!”
Obama on ACORN Mobs: “I don’t want to quell anger. I think people are right to be angry! I’m angry!”
Obama to His Mercenary Army: “Hit Back Tw...ice As Hard”
Obama on the private sector: “We talk to these folks… so I know whose ass to kick.“
Obama to voters: Republican victory would mean “hand to hand combat”
Obama to lib supporters: “It’s time to Fight for it.”
Obama to Latino supporters: “Punish your enemies.”
Obama to democrats: “I’m itching for a fight.”
Obama to Latino supporters: “Punish your enemies.”
Obama to democrats: “I’m itching for a fight.”

More from http://www.therightperspective.org/2010/06/12/a-history-of-obamas-violent-rhetoric/

Boehner puts Pelosi in place during gavel ceremony. Wow

If video fails, go to http://divine-ripples.blogspot.com/2011/01/gop-will-disappoint-sometimes-shouldnt.html

CBO Says Repealing ObamaCare Would Reduce Net Spending by $540 Billion in Letter to Congressional Staffers!

The Congressional Budget Office, in an email to Capitol Hill staffers obtained by the Spectator, has said that repealing the national health care law would reduce net spending by $540 billion in the ten year period from 2012 through 2021. That number represents the cost of the new provisions, minus Medicare cuts. Repealing the bill would also eliminate $770 billion in taxes. It’s the tax hikes in the health care law (along with the Medicare cuts) which accounts for the $230 billion in deficit reduction.

Full email, from Edward “Sandy” Davis, CBO’s Associate Director for Legislative Affairs, below.

To interested Hill staff:

CBO and the staff of the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) have not yet developed a detailed estimate of the budgetary impact of H.R. 2, the Repealing the Job-Killing Health Care Law Act, which would repeal the major health care legislation enacted in March 2010. Yesterday, we released a preliminary analysis of that legislation indicating that, over the 2012-2021 period, the effect of enacting H.R. 2 on the federal budget as a result of changes in direct spending and revenues is likely to be an increase in deficits in the vicinity of $230 billion, plus or minus the effects of forthcoming technical and economic changes to CBO’s and JCT’s projections for that period.

We have been asked to provide the revenue and direct spending components of that total.  Extrapolating the estimated budgetary effects of the original health care legislation and accounting for the effects of subsequent legislation, CBO anticipates that enacting H.R. 2 would probably yield, for the 2012-2021 period, a reduction in revenues in the neighborhood of $770 billion and a reduction in outlays in the vicinity of $540 billion, plus or minus the effects of forthcoming technical and economic changes to CBO’s and JCT’s projections.

CBO will post a Director’s blog with this information on the CBO website shortly.  Please let me know if you have any questions.

Sandy

Edward “Sandy” Davis

Associate Director for Legislative Affairs

Congressional Budget Office

House Nullifies Votes of Two GOP Reps. Who Skipped Swearing-In. Precedent established for nullifying POTUS official acts?

From TheBlaze  House Nullifies Votes of Two GOP Reps. Who Skipped Swearing-In. 

House Republicans had to correct a first-week gaffe by nullifying the votes of two of their members that were cast before they were sworn in.
Democrats pounced on the mistake, saying Republicans violated the Constitution on their first day in the majority by allowing the pair to vote six times before they were sworn in.
The House voted 257-159 to nullify those votes cast by Pete Sessions of Texas, the party campaign chief, and Mike Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania. Retracting their votes didn’t affect any outcomes. The two were at a reception when others took the oath Wednesday. They were sworn in Thursday.

Can this be a precedent for nullifying the acts of the POTUS because of a constitutional violation of eligibility requirements?

Liturgical Abuse: Congregation Mesmerized; Petitions Rome for Regulations

From BadVestments

Did he lose a bet or a dare?

Perhaps this weed psychadelic theme is for a parish in San Francisco. 

If this guy was presiding in that cult of peace, he might have been sodomized then beaten to a pulp for pulling a stunt like this.

I mean, "Just what is his fashion statement here?  I am the primordial goo from whence life began?
Perhaps the cleaners switched the packages from the Aloha Mu-mu club.