The left ridicules but the right has comedy. Here's a short that addresses some of the political hot buttons today.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_mQPvKXw3U&feature=player_embedded
Apr 30, 2010
The Pro-Choice Public Education Project Holds That There Should Be More Abortions.
With the Clintons, the position was: Make abortions safe, legal and rare. With Obama it became make abortion legal but try to reduce the need for it by addressing the causes of abortion. (On the side, though sounding humanitarian and compassionate, these positions are still immoral. And I think those were just words in Obama's case.)
Yesterday, we read in a liberal website, that abortion should be more not less and is actually good for the health of the woman. Aimée Thorne-Thomsen of Pro-Choice Public Education Project writes, "On the other hand, if those 1.21 million abortions represent only the women who could access abortion financially, geographically or otherwise, then that number is too low. Yes, too low. If that’s the case, then what is an appropriate response? How do we best support women and their reproductive health? Do we dare admit that increasing the number of abortions might be not only good for women’s health, but also moral and just?"
Read the rest at: http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2010/04/26/safe-legal-rare-another-perspective
It is hard to understand how some people can be so blinded about the personhood of an unborn child. I guess if one has been stunted into being a perpetual child, then one's capacity to see others outside oneself is equally impaired. And I thought women had a maternal instinct.
Yesterday, we read in a liberal website, that abortion should be more not less and is actually good for the health of the woman. Aimée Thorne-Thomsen of Pro-Choice Public Education Project writes, "On the other hand, if those 1.21 million abortions represent only the women who could access abortion financially, geographically or otherwise, then that number is too low. Yes, too low. If that’s the case, then what is an appropriate response? How do we best support women and their reproductive health? Do we dare admit that increasing the number of abortions might be not only good for women’s health, but also moral and just?"
Read the rest at: http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2010/04/26/safe-legal-rare-another-perspective
It is hard to understand how some people can be so blinded about the personhood of an unborn child. I guess if one has been stunted into being a perpetual child, then one's capacity to see others outside oneself is equally impaired. And I thought women had a maternal instinct.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
Dr. Rubinstein asserts that Obama supports the destruction of Israel because the creation of this state has been a historical mistake. If t...
-
Will The 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Be STOLEN by using the 2004 Hugo Chávez Recall Model that was used in Venezuela? Venezuela: Aca...
-
http://www.catholicsistas.com/2012/12/19/salvation-army-bells-for-abortion/ excerpt SALVATION ARMY MISSION STATEMENT On its surface the...
-
http://www.facebook.com/the40film http://www.twitter.com/the40film 40 is a film that will take on the heated issue of abortion in our nat...
-
It is appalling, the way that the Democrats were so remorseless in that lie. It’s like they thought that the rules simply didn’t apply to...
-
If video fails, click here or go to http://divine-ripples.blogspot.com/2011/03/video-massacre-of-israeli-family-by.html (This video was c...
Blog Archive
- ► 2013 (529)
- ► 2012 (797)
- ► 2011 (540)
- ▼ 2010 (672)