The left ridicules but the right has comedy. Here's a short that addresses some of the political hot buttons today.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_mQPvKXw3U&feature=player_embedded
Apr 30, 2010
The Pro-Choice Public Education Project Holds That There Should Be More Abortions.
With the Clintons, the position was: Make abortions safe, legal and rare. With Obama it became make abortion legal but try to reduce the need for it by addressing the causes of abortion. (On the side, though sounding humanitarian and compassionate, these positions are still immoral. And I think those were just words in Obama's case.)
Yesterday, we read in a liberal website, that abortion should be more not less and is actually good for the health of the woman. Aimée Thorne-Thomsen of Pro-Choice Public Education Project writes, "On the other hand, if those 1.21 million abortions represent only the women who could access abortion financially, geographically or otherwise, then that number is too low. Yes, too low. If that’s the case, then what is an appropriate response? How do we best support women and their reproductive health? Do we dare admit that increasing the number of abortions might be not only good for women’s health, but also moral and just?"
Read the rest at: http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2010/04/26/safe-legal-rare-another-perspective
It is hard to understand how some people can be so blinded about the personhood of an unborn child. I guess if one has been stunted into being a perpetual child, then one's capacity to see others outside oneself is equally impaired. And I thought women had a maternal instinct.
Yesterday, we read in a liberal website, that abortion should be more not less and is actually good for the health of the woman. Aimée Thorne-Thomsen of Pro-Choice Public Education Project writes, "On the other hand, if those 1.21 million abortions represent only the women who could access abortion financially, geographically or otherwise, then that number is too low. Yes, too low. If that’s the case, then what is an appropriate response? How do we best support women and their reproductive health? Do we dare admit that increasing the number of abortions might be not only good for women’s health, but also moral and just?"
Read the rest at: http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2010/04/26/safe-legal-rare-another-perspective
It is hard to understand how some people can be so blinded about the personhood of an unborn child. I guess if one has been stunted into being a perpetual child, then one's capacity to see others outside oneself is equally impaired. And I thought women had a maternal instinct.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
The Church needs to review performance during the recent elections. Why Hillary won in New York, Massachussetts, California, New Jersey, Ma...
-
Why be an eagle when one can wallow with seagulls? Because I am an eagle, not a seagull.
-
EPIC FAIL. Pelosi: The President Put Forth an ‘Excellent Proposal’ -- Got 0 Votes http://bit.ly/VwBWoF President Obama’s fiscal year 20...
-
Bishops ignore the mandates of canon or Church law for pastoral reasons i.e. to save the sinner. However, I do know of an abortion provider ...
-
Historic. What muslims don't want you to see. Better download and save because this won't be up for long.
Blog Archive
- ► 2013 (529)
- ► 2012 (797)
- ► 2011 (540)
- ▼ 2010 (672)