Sep 1, 2012
Romney Flip Flop on Abortion. Ron Paul Better?
I've seen videos about how Romney changed his position on abortion. But lately, he seems to be a die hard pro-lifer. He even rejected his first VP choice because of her pro-choice stance. See report at
http://hotair.com/archives/2012/08/31/report-romney-vetted-rice-for-vp-rejected-her-because-she-wouldnt-budge-on-abortion/ So, I will give him the benefit of the doubt.
Others think that Ron Paul is the right candidate for the conscientious voter. Here is when the best becomes the enemy of the good or how a bird in hand is better than two in a bush. It has been proven during the primaries that Ron will not get enough votes to beat Obama. So, voting for him will take away votes from Romney who would have had a chance had the GOP and Independents been solid in their backing. Consequently, the voter who wrote in the perfect candidate, Ron, effectively elected the immoral incumbent - albeit unwittingly.
Jesus taught us to be cunning as serpents. So, while a vote for Romney as the lesser evil can still be voting for some evil, it will overcome the greater evil. And a vote for Ron will be hypothetically perfect, it will fail in beating Obama and as a result make evil reign.
An example of this is the parable of the weeds and the wheat. The farmer did not pull out the weeds that were growing with the wheat. So must we not reject Romney because of his weeds because he has wheat as well.
http://hotair.com/archives/2012/08/31/report-romney-vetted-rice-for-vp-rejected-her-because-she-wouldnt-budge-on-abortion/ So, I will give him the benefit of the doubt.
Others think that Ron Paul is the right candidate for the conscientious voter. Here is when the best becomes the enemy of the good or how a bird in hand is better than two in a bush. It has been proven during the primaries that Ron will not get enough votes to beat Obama. So, voting for him will take away votes from Romney who would have had a chance had the GOP and Independents been solid in their backing. Consequently, the voter who wrote in the perfect candidate, Ron, effectively elected the immoral incumbent - albeit unwittingly.
Jesus taught us to be cunning as serpents. So, while a vote for Romney as the lesser evil can still be voting for some evil, it will overcome the greater evil. And a vote for Ron will be hypothetically perfect, it will fail in beating Obama and as a result make evil reign.
An example of this is the parable of the weeds and the wheat. The farmer did not pull out the weeds that were growing with the wheat. So must we not reject Romney because of his weeds because he has wheat as well.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
The Church needs to review performance during the recent elections. Why Hillary won in New York, Massachussetts, California, New Jersey, Ma...
-
Why be an eagle when one can wallow with seagulls? Because I am an eagle, not a seagull.
-
EPIC FAIL. Pelosi: The President Put Forth an ‘Excellent Proposal’ -- Got 0 Votes http://bit.ly/VwBWoF President Obama’s fiscal year 20...
-
Bishops ignore the mandates of canon or Church law for pastoral reasons i.e. to save the sinner. However, I do know of an abortion provider ...
-
Historic. What muslims don't want you to see. Better download and save because this won't be up for long.
Blog Archive
- ► 2013 (529)
- ▼ 2012 (797)
- ► 2011 (540)
- ► 2010 (672)