"Last week, a congressional hearing exposed an effort to give another agency—the Federal Election Commission—unprecedented power to regulate political speech online. At a House Administration Committee hearing last Tuesday, Patton Boggs attorney William McGinley explained that the sloppy statutory language in the “DISCLOSE Act” would extend the FEC’s control over broadcast communications to all “covered communications,” including the blogosphere. ... The bill, however, would radically redefine how the FEC regulates political commentary. A section of the DISCLOSE Act would exempt traditional media outlets from coordination regulations, but the exemption does not include bloggers, only “a communication appearing in a news story, commentary, or editorial distributed through the facilities of any broadcasting station, newspaper, magazine or other periodical publication…” More here. (1)
In other words, they will leave the MSM a.k.a. government propaganda outlets with some lattitude but be able to control or intimidate with legal action the alternative media.
As Ed Morrisey pointed out, "If the Democrats in Congress wanted to ensure that the FEC would not investigate political speech by bloggers, they would have written their exemptions to include bloggers instead of just traditional media outlets. The purposeful lack of exemption for bloggers looks ominous indeed — and could be used to harass smaller, unfunded bloggers out of the realm of political debate." More here. (2)
The bullying never stops. But it can be understood. You can take the man out of Chicago but you cannot take Chicago out of the man. The question is, "Can we stop them in time?"
References:
1. How the DISCLOSE Act will restrict free speech by Bradley Smith & Jeff Patch
May 18, 2010 at http://reason.com/archives/2010/05/18/from-banning-books-to-banning
2. Congress about to limit political speech of bloggers? May 19, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
http://hotair.com/archives/2010/05/19/congress-about-to-limit-political-speech-of-bloggers
Popular Posts
-
It's a government of thugs, by thugs and for thugs. No more first amendment. Free speech is not free. If they don't like your wor...
-
This was circulated in the web with the comment: "This is a recently published photo that was guarded by the Vatican Secret Archive...
-
A co-worker told me that he did not want to bring children into the world because it was a messed up place. I had kids anyway and here...
-
When told that the poor had no bread, Marie-Antoinette said, "Let them eat cake." Some say she was clueless or apathetic; othe...
-
Are Card. Wuerl's pastors closet Obama supporters? Dissent within the Archdiocese of Washington D.C.Remember when I posted about how disappointed I was with Card. Wuerl because I did not hear his letter against the HHS mandate read during t...
-
If video fails, click here or go to http://divine-ripples.blogspot.com/2011/10/occupy-wall-street-in-their-words.html Video Exposing Occup...
-
If video fails, click here or go to http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/california-passes-bill-mandating-pro-gay-teaching-in-schools-no-parent...
-
Excerpted from http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/52295?utm_source=CFP+Mailout&utm_campaign=ecf7b856e0-Call_to_Champions...
-
Dr. Rubinstein asserts that Obama supports the destruction of Israel because the creation of this state has been a historical mistake. If t...
-
http://www.barenakedislam.com/2014/05/15/remember-when-barack-hussein-obama-threatened-nigeria-in-2013-with-sanctions-if-they-came-down-too-...
Blog Archive
- ► 2013 (528)
- ► 2012 (797)
- ► 2011 (540)
- ▼ 2010 (672)
No comments:
Post a Comment