Jul 11, 2010

Democrats' documentary alleging rampant voter fraud by Obama campaign

I don't know why this is coming out now.  Is it a way for the Democrats to distance themselves away from Obama?  It could be a gimmick then again it tarnishes even more the legitimacy of his office and erodes his moral authority.  If anything, it alerts and alarms people to be more  solicitous in guarding the sancity of the coming elections.


Excerpt:
"This documentary is about the disenfranchising of American citizens by the Democratic Party and the Obama Campaign. We the People have made this film. Democrats have sent in their stories from all parts of America. We want to be heard and let the country know how our party has sanctioned the actions of what we feel are Obama Campaign "Chicago Machine" dirty politics. We believe this infamous campaign of "change" from Chicago encouraged and created an army to steal caucus packets, falsify documents, change results, allow unregistered people to vote, scare and intimidate Hillary supporters, stalk them, threaten them, lock them out of their polling places, silence their voices and stop their right to vote, which is, of course, all documented in "We Will Not Be Silenced."

"We Will Not Be Silenced" is about the people who fight back by simply telling their stories: Teachers, professors, civil rights activists, lawyers, janitors, physicists, ophthalmologists, accountants, mathematicians, retirees - all bound together by their love of America and Democracy. They will tell us their experiences and how they feel betrayed by their own party. They will discuss how their party has disenfranchised them and how, when they saw and reported multiple instances of fraud, everyone turned a blind eye. Rather than support and protect the voices and votes of its loyal members, the DNC chose to sweep this under the rug by looking the other way, or using ceremony and quasi-investigations to assuage angry voters. It is our opinion there never before has been such a "dirty" campaign; the campaign that has broken the hearts and spirits of American voters, who once believed in the Democractic voting system.  More at source. "

Humor: 24 Types of Authoritarians

Theocrat, Green Zealot, Deluded, Stockholm Syndrome, Nanny Stater, Entitled, Drug Warrior, Freeloader, Xenophobe, Elitist Snob, Public Mandate, Humanitarian, Dreamer,

Video: Muslim leader presents Islam honestly and it is not like what Obama says.

There may be peaceful and peace-loving Muslims, but that doesn't change the doctrine of Islam. As this leader explains, it is not a religion of peace.  Could an undiscerning compassion and political correctness be the death of us?
For people who want to escape its grasp cfr. http://divine-ripples.blogspot.com/2010/04/leave-islam-safely.html


Video description: CBN News traveled to London to talk with Anjem Choudary, a leading Muslim radical who says Islamic teachings are what shaped his pro-jihad message.  Hear in his own words that Islam is NOT a "religion of peace", but rather that Jihad and the killing of Christians and Jews is authorized by the Koran.


If video fails, go to http://divine-ripples.blogspot.com/2010/07/video-muslim-leader-presents-islam.html

Video: Getting close to God by eating to live and not living to eat.

I used to say casually that I have one vice and that is enjoying food too much.  It sounded harmless enough compared to others but then it is still a sin.  Now that sin has caught up with me as I became a diabetic.

If you also think the same way, then check out this article.
Excerpts:  " Gluttony seeks after immediate gratification, pleasure and comfort with little regard for the needs of others.  Eating more than you want or need just to prevent others from getting your share would also be gluttony.  This deadly sin leads to an unbalanced, addictive and materialistic existence that excludes God.... An aid in overcoming gluttony is periodic fasting – of two small meals and one regular-sized meal with no snacks in between (as the Church recommends).  Abstinence of meat, a favorite food or even eating something I don’t like (like brussel sprouts) is also recommended in mastering gluttony.  It is not necessary to eliminate pleasurable things but only to limit them. "


Video:  How someone overcame her habit of over eating.  Practical tips.


The spiritual aspect:  the sin of gluttony

Video: Thrilling. Obama's Panthers run out by angry mob.

People have had enough and are not afraid of the New Black Panthers as they chase them out to the chants of "USA! USA!".  It seems to be a street indictment of Obama, his Democrats and gangsta methods.  There is hope in the people.

Video description: Fire up the HARLEY'S and see the PUNKS RUN! ((lol))
On December 4, 2007 in Pasadena, TX (suburb of Houston) Joe Horn, 61, shot and killed two men that had burglarized his neighbor's home on November 14, 2007.
Racist Panthers thought they'd show off, marching through this town in defense of the theif who was shot.. Think again! Americans have a right to protect their homes and WILL! 

If video fails, go to http://divine-ripples.blogspot.com/2010/07/video-scary-enraged-neighborhood-chase.html

Jul 10, 2010

Proof that Obamacare uses tax dollars for abortions from the 2000 page text, chapter & verse.

I ran into a fan of Keehan who defended her position that there is no federal funding of abortion.  She also chided us for being ignorant.
Here's proof that Keehan is naive and ingenuous about the federal funding of abortion in Obamacare.
http://www.examiner.com/x-49886-Houston-Religion--Politics-Examiner~y2010m6d7-Health-care-reform-act-funds-abortion
and
on page 779 of the 906 page bill, in Section 1301 (1) the bill specifically states the following:"‘‘
(1) IN GENERAL.—A State may elect to prohibit abortion coverage in qualified health plans offered through an Exchange in such State if such State enacts a law to provide for such prohibition."


Excerpts:  How the act funds elective abortions
The Act uses a "segregation of funds" policy to subsidize health insurance plans that cover elective abortions. These subsidized health insurance plans are designed to make coverage available to millions of Americans who currently lack coverage. Each purchaser of a subsidized health insurance plan that includes elective abortion coverage is required by the Act to make two premium payments per month. One payment goes into a fund that pays for abortion coverage.

Thus, persons with subsidized plans that cover abortion will receive abortions paid for by the premiums of everyone enrolled in said plans. This "segregation of funds" method clearly reverses long-standing federal policy of not using federal monies for any part of a subsidized health benefits package that covers elective abortions. The federal government's health insurance subsidies will expand abortion coverage and make abortions more accessible.

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) manages the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP). The Act authorizes the OPM to contract with private insurers to provide coverage to federal employees. The Act requires the OPM Director to ensure that in each state there is at least one plan available that covers elective abortions. Other available plans may still fund elective abortions using the "segregation of funds" method described above.

The Act further appropriates $7 billion over five years to create a "Community Health Center Fund". This was expanded to $9.5 billion in the budget reconciliation bill passed March 25 (Public Law 111-152). These funds are appropriated outside the bounds of annual appropriations bills normally within the scope of the Hyde amendment and other similar riders.
The only specific limitation on these funds within the Act relates to "school-based" health centers. While these centers will dispense contraceptive drugs and devices to minors, the "school-based" health center funds may not be used to pay for abortions. Otherwise, there is nothing in the Act to restrict health centers funded by the Act from paying for abortions, and it isn't clear whether "school-based" centers may use federal funds for abortion referrals.

How the new Health Care Law Limits Senior Citizens' Right to Use Their Own Money to Save Their Own Lives.

Listen to Master of Ceremonies and National Right to Life Executive Director David N. O’Steen give background on how the health care system worked before and will work after Obamacare. Then, Federal Legislative Director Douglas Johnson discusses abortion coverage in the new law. Finally, Burke Balch, J.D. who directs the Powell Center for Medical Ethics discusses rationing components of the law. To download the PowerPoint presentation accompanying the discussion of rationing, click on "Rationing in the Obama Health Care Law, June 26, 2010." To see as well as hear the presentation, view the C-SPAN coverage.


View video from http://powellcenterformedicalethics.blogspot.com/

Popular Posts

Blog Archive